Date:

20.10.2004

Participants:

Dieter Fensel, Jos de Bruijn, Emilia Cimpian, Cristina Feier, Armin Haller, Uwe Keller, Rubén Lara, Holger Lausen, Adrian Mocan, Francisco Jose Martin-Recuerda Moyano, Matthew Moran, Eyal Oren,  Axel Polleres, Livia Predoiu, Dumitru Roman, Ioan Toma, Martin Murth, Jacek Kopecky, Douglas Foxvog

Notes taken by:

Adrian Mocan

Deliverables:

• D3.1 WSMO Primer
  • In Related Documents section - WSMO version 1.0 not WSMO 10
  • to conform with the deliverables template
  • update the Authors section and add Jos as reviewer for this document
  • Abstract
    • WSMO is not a language specification
  • Related Documents
    • from the PDF version remove the local path from the bottom of the page
  • Introduction
    • replace "SDK WSMO working Group" with "WSMO working group part of the SDK"
    • delete the second phrase form the first paragraph and the figure
    • D16 is not a survey but a specification
  • Section 2.2
    • WSMO design principle: delete the following bullet: Peer-to-Peer vs Client-Semantics and Execution Semantics
  • Section 4
    • some listings are outside of the margins
    • non functional properties are repeated in most of the listings but they should be described only once; only those nfp in which something is explained should be listed again.
    • make sure that the listings are valid WSML syntax
  • Section 4.3
    • use only one, simple running example in the whole section
    • Listing 6: duration it is not of type dataAndTime
    • Listing 7: train should not be of type string
    • Listing 11: not part of a WSMO description for a WS
    • Listing 12: issue: definedBy constraint
    • Listing 16: it doesn't represent a valid goal description (it contains
    • Listing 18: rename: accAtts, finAtts etc
    • Listing 19: not valid WSML syntax
    • Listing 20: why the end location has to be in Austria or Germany?
  • Section 4.6
    • a goal description for the mediators is required
  • Section 5
    • issue: if is necessary to list all the deliverables in there. Decision: keep this section like it is
  • new version by next week Friday (29.10.2004)

• D14. Choreography
  • Introduction
    • Ruben: the argument for using ASM is very week
    • Eyal: "scientifically well founded" it is not saying to much
  • Section 2
    • typo: Amoong
    • missing the distinction between variant and invariant part of a state
    • in and out will disappear
    • Listing 2: Ruben: the functions are not defined. They should have nfp describing what are they doing
    • Listing 3 does not exist; Listing 4 to be renumbered as 3
    • Listing 4: to perform update on instances; To be align with the WSML syntax; Eyal: is this meant to be a black box or a white box?
  • new version by Friday (22.10.2004)

• D24. WSMO and WS Policy
  • general comment: very short and difficult to understand
  • Dieter: where do we plug in he WSMO specifications?
  • a new section would be required: alignment of WSMO with other WS specifications
  • this deliverable has to be renamed
  • new version by next week Friday (29.10.2004)
  • it has to become self-content: the reader should be able to understand this deliverable without reading the references
  • the citation style is not consistent with the other deliverables; it will be changed to the standard one for the next version

• General issue:
  • to add the active members of WSMO to the authors of the D2, considered to be the core deliverable of WSMO
  • for the Journal Paper: the same as for D2