Meeting Notes for WSMO
Meeting on
Participants
Dieter,
Emilia, Enrica, Ruben, Holger, Armin, Uwe Francisco, Michal, Michael,
Matt, Axel, Livia, Tit, Ioan, Laurentiu, Sheila McIlraith,
Michael Gruninger, Daniela Bernardi,
Rick Hull
General
Deliverables
o
D3.2
o
Implementation of the web
service: Holger did it with some remarks of Katherina & Kathrin. Is
roughly what is presented in D3.2
o
WS-Specs are not in the
WSMO Repository at present. Will be put there
o
Mediators: Listing 7,8,9,10
are not implemented so far
o
Michael has here some
interested students who might implement this stuff
o
Francisco was determined by
Dieter to supervise one of the students if the student is interested
o
No rationale is given for
the ontology in Listing 1. Fix this
o
Listing 5: Is not a goal
but a goal instance. List. 5 should show the goal template whereas List. 6
should show the goal in the next version
o
List. 6: This seems to be
not nice modelling: Use predicates and assumptions here (valid creditcard) and define valid predicate in an ontology
o
Page 40: GG Mediator is
missing. We will have it in the next version
o
Page 43: Reference to
F-Logic: Mention the mailing list
o
Sec. 3.1.3. last paragraph: Downsize and rewrite!
o
Still: Real ontologies are required for this deliverable as Dieter
mentions
o
Next step: Purchase Order
Ontology needs to be redefined, the location ontology will be detailed (Armin Haller will take care of the former!)
o
Next version: July 19th
o
Strategy with the 2nd
Use case: Start working on it at the end of July
o
D12
o
Basic message: Ontologize the content of the deliverable
o
New section 4.1 will be
included which contains and clarifies some stuff from section 3.1ff
o
Sec. 3.1 is not an ontology
here: Write concepts as extensions of WSMO standard elements
o
Put everything in the WSMO
style
o
Clarify Figure 1,2,3 in a
general way
o
Figures should always have
a legend and be self-contained and understandable
o
Next version in 3 weeks (19th
July)
Discussion
o
Discussion document “On Mediators”
o
Introduction: “None of the
authors” should be used instead of “nobody in WSMO”
o
Dieter disagrees in many
aspects
o
Including the mappings in
the mediators is precisely the goal in WSMO; but in the capability description
of the mediator service
o
Namespaces are in Dieter’s
opinion very relevant (disagreement on having only one single ontology mediatior)
o
Everybody is invited to put
some efforts in providing a concrete proposal (far beyond this document) for
single types of mediators
o
Francisco would be
basically interested to contribute, Michael and Uwe are at present not able to take an initiative here,
since they have a lot of other things to care about.
o
Dieter thanks the authors
for the discussion document, but disagrees in most points
o
GG mediator has a reduction, Dieter thinks that this might be questionable in
the future.
o
Discussion of WW-Mediators
is far much ahead at present. We open the discussion here again after the use
case D3.2 has been finished.
Talks
o
Sheila McIlraith,
Rick Hull, Daniela Bernardi and Michael Gruninger gave a presentation on their “FLOWS” proposal in
the SWSI initiative.