Dieter, Emilia, Enrica, Ruben, Holger, Armin, Uwe Francisco, Michal, Michael, Matt, Axel, Livia, Tit, Ioan, Laurentiu, Sheila McIlraith, Michael Gruninger, Daniela Bernardi, Rick Hull
o Implementation of the web service: Holger did it with some remarks of Katherina & Kathrin. Is roughly what is presented in D3.2
o WS-Specs are not in the WSMO Repository at present. Will be put there
o Mediators: Listing 7,8,9,10 are not implemented so far
o Michael has here some interested students who might implement this stuff
o Francisco was determined by Dieter to supervise one of the students if the student is interested
o No rationale is given for the ontology in Listing 1. Fix this
o Listing 5: Is not a goal but a goal instance. List. 5 should show the goal template whereas List. 6 should show the goal in the next version
o List. 6: This seems to be not nice modelling: Use predicates and assumptions here (valid creditcard) and define valid predicate in an ontology
o Page 40: GG Mediator is missing. We will have it in the next version
o Page 43: Reference to F-Logic: Mention the mailing list
o Sec. 3.1.3. last paragraph: Downsize and rewrite!
o Still: Real ontologies are required for this deliverable as Dieter mentions
o Next step: Purchase Order Ontology needs to be redefined, the location ontology will be detailed (Armin Haller will take care of the former!)
o Next version: July 19th
o Strategy with the 2nd Use case: Start working on it at the end of July
o Basic message: Ontologize the content of the deliverable
o New section 4.1 will be included which contains and clarifies some stuff from section 3.1ff
o Sec. 3.1 is not an ontology here: Write concepts as extensions of WSMO standard elements
o Put everything in the WSMO style
o Clarify Figure 1,2,3 in a general way
o Figures should always have a legend and be self-contained and understandable
o Next version in 3 weeks (19th July)
o Discussion document “On Mediators”
o Introduction: “None of the authors” should be used instead of “nobody in WSMO”
o Dieter disagrees in many aspects
o Including the mappings in the mediators is precisely the goal in WSMO; but in the capability description of the mediator service
o Namespaces are in Dieter’s opinion very relevant (disagreement on having only one single ontology mediatior)
o Everybody is invited to put some efforts in providing a concrete proposal (far beyond this document) for single types of mediators
o Francisco would be basically interested to contribute, Michael and Uwe are at present not able to take an initiative here, since they have a lot of other things to care about.
o Dieter thanks the authors for the discussion document, but disagrees in most points
o GG mediator has a reduction, Dieter thinks that this might be questionable in the future.
o Discussion of WW-Mediators is far much ahead at present. We open the discussion here again after the use case D3.2 has been finished.
o Sheila McIlraith, Rick Hull, Daniela Bernardi and Michael Gruninger gave a presentation on their “FLOWS” proposal in the SWSI initiative.