------------------------------------------------ Start of #wsmo buffer: Wed Mar 31 18:04:11 2004 *** Now talking in #wsmo. *** Users on #wsmo: Jos titi Adrian matt Eyal Laurentiu @michal *** End of /NAMES list. *** Mode for channel #wsmo is "+" *** Channel #wsmo was created at Wed Mar 31 14:56:27 2004 *** Join to #wsmo completed in 1 seconds. *** Uwe (Uwe@blah-6687FB6.uibk.ac.at) has joined channel #wsmo Matt here *** Emilia (ecimpian@blah-11C1D6E1.nuigalway.ie) has joined channel #wsmo * Jos says Hello! *** oxel (Axel_Polle@blah-6687FB6.uibk.ac.at) has joined channel #wsmo 5 hours ? welcome to another wizmo! matt: bargaining? joined the Borg collective in that case - 2 hours prepare to be assimilated resistance is futile *** Signoff: Uwe (Client exited) Borg collective? what's that? buzzz!!! :):) Eyal: I just saw your mail on D3.1 *** ying (ying.ding@blah-6687FB6.uibk.ac.at) has joined channel #wsmo oxel: yeah, it is a bit late i guess, sorry it is a good idea for everyone to fix typos immediately, I think! *** Dieter_ (Dieter@blah-6687FB6.uibk.ac.at) has joined channel #wsmo but it would be important to set editor mail notification for all deliverables... yes, but this delv. is not yet in cvs, so i didn't do it yet. how do you set mail notification *** Signoff: ying (Quit: ) *** ying (ying.ding@blah-6687FB6.uibk.ac.at) has joined channel #wsmo *** Uwe_ (Uwe@blah-6687FB6.uibk.ac.at) has joined channel #wsmo #wsmo-protocol ying, I got the following: ying, blecker, titi, uwe, emilia, fionula, reinhold, dieter, axel, adrian, matt, eyal, laurent michal, zugmann hth I proposal to mark the following deliverables as web-standard documents, which should be provided in xhtml (the rest needs only a PDF version): D2 D3.1 D3.2 D14 D15 D16.1 D16.2 D16.3 D16.5 I'm not yet sure about 16.6, 16.7, 16.8 Any comments? *** Edward (Edward@blah-3A228D27.nuigalway.ie) has joined channel #wsmo $ finger peterz Login: peterz Name: Peter Zugmann *** David (chatzilla@blah-1B63902F.nuigalway.ie) has joined channel #wsmo I assume everybody agrees with my proposal? goalNonFunctionalProps:[Subject ->> {travel, leisure, plane}] should be: goalNonFunctionalProps:nonFunctionalProperties[subject ->> {travel, leisure, plane}] #wsmo-protocal Ying, please put in the protocol that the fix for the example at the end of section 4.3.3 in D10 can be found in the chat log #wsmo-protocol *** oxel has changed the topic on channel #wsmo to WSMO Ying, please put my proposal in the protocol as is axel, I just sent to you drawing as starting point for our later discussion Dieter, what is the deadline for D18: Language API? Axel, Titi, are you authors of D18? not that I know of I still didn'T get the general idea what we want to achieve there ying please include me in 13.0 as well what is d18? Ontology Language API, part of WSML do we get notes from the first wsml meeting? will be sent around by Uwe okiedokie jos: since you seem to have an idea of what D18 is about, but the others did not really, could you send a paragraph around on that? Dieter is the editor jos: the "use case" could be a restricted ontology... some kind of mapping refinement we were talking about? not at all well, I think yes nothing is refined because you only need a subset of the mediation that is not a refinement but a subset which can also be seen as kind of refinement, but a very simple one, or no? (trying t ounderstand things better) If you don't refine anything, you have an empty refiner, but still a refinement well the mediator from O1 to O2 can be refined to one from O1s to O2s? You use *exactly* the same mediator or you use a proper subset hmmm, but you do not need the full mediator, or the mediator might be complete for the sub-ontology, where it is not for the whole ontology! *** holger (holger@blah-21AF084A.mindlab.umd.edu) has joined channel #wsmo hmmm, but you do not need the full mediator, or the mediator might be complete for the sub-ontology, where it is not for the whole ontology! ooops sorry, didn't want to repeat myself can anybody give me a brief summary, what cookies can do and what they can't in this context? ok, just discussed yes, the mediator might be complete for the sub-ontology, where it is not for the whole ontology! sorry the mediator for the full ontologies is also complete for the sub-ontology and the mapping between the sub-ontologies is a proper subset of the full mapping links concerning WS-CTX: WS-CAF: http://www.iona.com/devcenter/standards/WS-CAF/ WS-Context: http://www.iona.com/devcenter/standards/WS-CAF/WSCTX.pdf also WS-CF: http://www.iona.com/devcenter/standards/WS-CAF/WSCF.pdf AFAIK, WS-CAF is not being standardized through any standardization body axel talk to you in 30 min *** Dieter_ has left #wsmo *** Signoff: Emilia (Quit: Leaving) *** Uwe_ has left #wsmo about ws-caf: i read in the faq they are going to submit it to stand.body, but not done yet... *** Signoff: matt (Quit: Trillian (http://www.ceruleanstudios.com)) *** Signoff: Edward (Quit: Leaving) what standard body? *** michal has left #wsmo *** michal (michal@blah-32896662.nuigalway.ie) has joined channel #wsmo *** michal has left #wsmo End of #wsmo buffer: Wed Mar 31 18:04:11 2004