Note WSMO Phone Conference ************************** Date: 16.02.2005 Taken by: Holger Lausen Participants: Christoph Bussler John Domingue Dieter Fensel Jos de Bruijn Emilia Cimpian Cristina Feier Martin Hepp Jacek Kopecky Reto Krummenacher Holger Lausen Adrian Mocan Francisco Jose Martin-Recuerda Moyano Axel Polleres Livia Predoiu Dumitru Roman James Scicluna Michael Stollberg W3C submission issues: ********************** Axel: submission documents in latest version available at: http://cvs.deri.at/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/wsmo/w3c-submission/ Elmar send out a request for support for submission. So far the following supporters are on board: -DERI Galway -DERI Innsbruck -BT -SAP -Open University Axel: Is there a minimum number for supporters Chris: No, but we should aim having the first page just a list of supporters Titi: What about ASG members Chris: Elmar is coordinating this Axel: initial documents online end of January Axel: end of February submission to w3c is planed Chris: SWSL plan to submit end of March, should we align dates? WSMO Document ------------- Axel: Lets Go through all documents: WSMO document: corresponds to D2, only introduction is rephrased. 3 open issues: * finalize introduction * include orchestration * Reviewers: Chris, Jon and Dieter Chris: All supporting companies should be Reviewer and there should be some deadline for that Axel: PDF sent end of the weak to three reviewers Jos: Figure 2 has to be redone. Figure 1 should be symmetric. Titi: insert some Text between figure 2 and listing 1. WSML Document ------------- Axel: WSML document to be discussed in the WSML conference, corresponding to D16 WSMX Document ------------- Emilia: so far overall architecture and entry points, currently discussing how to formulate interface definition Axel: Emilia shall assign formal reviewers for WSMX definition. Chris: Interface Description in WSMX submission shall they be Java, WSDL, IDL or WSML? Jos: Which interfaces Chris: e.g. to the mediator component John: How much work is for multiple description? Jos: WSML can describe functionality not interfaces Jack: leave it with Java for readability Chris: We'll try Java and may be look at it again Relation Ship Document ---------------------- Axel: Review comments from Ruben? Jack: Already incorporated. Missing is details on KIF for OWL-S and a WSMO reference to Journal Axel: Reviewers: Dieter, Martin Hepp, Frank Leymann Jack makes PDF and send it Jack: OK Primer Document --------------- Axel: is it different to WSMO Deliverable? Cristina: except the overview of all wsmo deliverables and some editorial issues YES Axel: The Submission should be self contained as much as possible Dieter: Fine if you want. Axel: Content will be discussed in WSMO conference W3C DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK WORKSHOP: ----------------------------------- (http://www.w3c.org/2005/01/ws-swsf-cfp.html) Chris: Shall we coordinate the submissions? Dieter: Submissions shall be WSMO, Choreography, WSMX, WSML, Choreography, Web Service critics Jack: Papers should reflect DERI opinion and not technology position Axel: there should be multiple one on each aspect Dieter: takes lead what is wrong with Web Services John leads the WSMO position paper WSML WSMX in different working groups takes also lead of Chroeogrphy until Saturday DIP shall also submit position papers John: I take care organizing that WSMO ISSUES *********** D2: --- Dieter: subsection 2.1 is missing Titi: Editorial mistake Dieter: UML things don't print Holger: now they print Dieter: page 16 everything after first sentence shall be deleted choreography and orchestration: a reference has to be added to the documents Jos: renaming of choreography (align with w3c) Dieter: no Michael: choreography is different defined in W3C Dieter: No we will keep our terminology update until Friday D3.1 ---- Holger: editorial changes in listings and text 4.1.1 impliesType ofType mixed. listing 4: validCreditCardDef should be Unary Dieter: no it is binary Holger: listing 10 in,out are now defined in default namespace should be better wsml#in Listing 11 memberOf should be after attributevalues. Dieter: Holger, Jos, John, Axel is reviewer (although John is Author) D14 --- Dieter: comments? Axel: what about an overall picture somewhere Dieter: no make it final and a new version by Friday NEXT WSMO phone conference ************************** 2nd of March 4pm Innsbruck time