Participants:Dieter, Emilia, Doug, Jaceck, Reto, Holger, Adrian, Martin, Titi, Michael, Ioan Juan, Ruben not active member anymore D14 Axel and James shall report on deliverable progress D24.2 Adrian sends email with final deadline for next version D29 please indicate which sections are written by which author? please also correct author in activity sheet section 1.1 delete reference to fensel and bussler paper introduce different mediation levels: (1) ontological (data), (2) logical (functionality), (3) choreography , (4) orchestration and then introduce the mediator structure, michael please do so. michael: delta relation is different for different types (e.g. gg an wg mediator) dieter: the delta is the same (difference in functionality) dieter: delta defines the logical theroy expression the difference section 2 delete second paragraph in 2.1 section 3 focus on logical mediation (functionality) and only refer to oo-mediation definition of the logical gap between goal and service, subsumption etc. should only be mentioned as special case. section 4 restructure: makes oo-mediation (oo-mediator) and logical mediation(gg-mediator) using previous described mediators. emilia: there have to be mentioned the matching notions (e.g. plug-in) dieter: this special purpose matches should go --- some discussion around specific matches and generic delate relation conclusion: funtional mediation should only be described in section 3 4.2.2 should be called communication level mediation section 5: michael should make a short section adopting it to the new structure. new version 2nd of September (probably without Emilias comments) D30 review from wsdl-s group ongoing. extensions are: allow pre/post also on interface level choreography could be added to wsdl-s attribute model reference should also be allowed for the wsdl service effects and assumptions are not explicitly differentiated from pre/postcondtions in wsdl-s, but can be done using non-functional properties. D31 REST: don't want stateful conversation between 2 resources, however one resource can have a state but this should not be private to a conversation WSRF add good practice how to encode state using wsdl (i.e. encoding statfull resources such as shopping carts into seperate web services) WSRF does not specify control flow over operations. what are we doing now with wsrf? ...nothing specific to wsrf Dieter: freeze activity D31.