WSMO minutes, 07-April-04
“Meeting Protocol”
Participants:
Dieter Fensel, David Aiken, Emilia Cimpian, Michael Felderer, Armin Haller, Edward Kilgarriff, Ruben Lara, Holger Lausen,Francisco Martin-Recuerda , Aine Leddy, Adrian Mocan, Matthew Moran, Eyal Oren,Chris Priest, Dumitru Roman,Ioan Toma, Michael Stollberg, Brian Wall
Organizational issues:
WSMO Deliverables:
o It has to refer to WSMO-Standard v0.2, not v0.3
o Add conclusions sections: one for section 2, one for section 3, and a general conclusions section (section 4)
o Correct spelling mistakes in the introduction
o Add links to the sections
o Section 1.2:Improve English writing and fix typos
o Section 1.2: Big mistake, it says the internals of the service are described with WSMO
o Legend of figures have to be put below the figure
o section 2.2.1: Michal Zaremba will correct it
o Last 3 paragraphs -> make 3 bullets
o Make bold an italic "autonomous", "distributed" and "heterogeneous"
o Michal will update figure 4
o Michal will clarify the ebXML thing in the document and make the document consistent
o References to WSMX deliverables are missing
o Section 3.1: use standard notion for date and time, make it consistent with the Primer
o Logical expressions: We need a detailed discussion in the next WSML phone conference
o "self-contained, self-describing, semantically marked-up software resources that can be published, discovered, composed and executed across the Web in a task driven automatic way": add reference to the book chapter and consider to update this sentence
o Update SOAP, WSDL and UDDI links and add references instead of direct links
o Next version: April 26th
o Changes made: introduction, definition of message types and actual content
o Mediators have still to be added
o Eyal will produce a new version 0.2 in a couple of days and open a version 0.3
o Exclude messageType and include mediators
o Next version: 9 April
o 13.1 will refer to the final version of WSMO-Lite 0.2
o Introduce capability request instead of goal
o Replace imported ontologies by ooMediators
o In general, make WSMO-Lite and D13.1 consistent
o Business partner would be WSMO-Full
o Clarify (summary) of what parts of the WSMX conceptual model are from WSMO-Lite, standard or full
o If we have WSMO-Lite, the WSMX conceptual model should only refer to WSMO-Lite, not repeat it
o Galway will think about what to do: keep WSMO-Lite or WSMX conceptual model defines WSMO-Lite and adds concepts for WSMO-Full
o integrationInstance is an instance of integrationType or not. If so, why is it not explictly modelled in the F-Logic definition? Formal model is wrong, it should be corrected
o Integration type: the name is misleading. It should be changed
o messageTypeDefinition: shouldn't it be subclass of concept with two new attributes? The name is also misleading. It has to be corrected
o message concept is also wrong. Correct it.
o Refer to WSMO-Lite and explain properly the new things introduced
o Next version: in 3 weeks
Papers presentation: